| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 |
Browse archives
Random MediaGoogle AdsRecent blog posts
|
Why cant there be a Secure and Perfect Version of MS Windows ever?The title for this post can be considered a misnomer. I think it should read: Well if you do write perfect software you are kicking yourself in your er.. belly, and sitting on the branch side of the saw. For any commercial company/ enterprise writing perfect and bug free software would mean:
So the moral:
There lies your future, never be too concerned about customer. Dont commit the fallacy of making your _current_paying_customer_ to your _once_upon_a_time_but_now_happy_and_satisfied_customer_, make the rat ask for more, make the rat shell out the money that actually belongs to you. Promise him a vista/ a wallpaper/ a new icon set/ themes/ music/ games or something. Ahh.. but those silly free(dom) software people, they are creating software in collaboration to reduce cost, loving what they do, take pride in it, develop communities, share code and above all remain poor for rest of their damned lives. Silly, they think they will achieve the nirwana of the perfect software. What if they do, the software is finished maybe final release, what after that no upgrades. Maybe small neenie teenie updates and ports to an 80486 or whatever poor old machines they have for their personal use. boring... NOTE: I know i am biased, but hey even I do not write anything perfect.
Submitted by Ajay Pal Singh Atwal on August 23, 2006 - 12:01am. categories [ GNU/ Linux | Humor | Security | Windows ]
Ajay Pal Singh Atwal's blog | 619 reads
Post new comment |